Model 17 of 74 · Strategy & Governance
ESG / Sustainability Maturity Assessment
Assess how deeply your organisation embeds environmental, social, and governance practices into strategy, operations, and reporting.
Pillars & areas
Levels
- 1AwarenessAcknowledged not systematic
- 2CommittedFormalised & resourced
- 3IntegratedWoven into strategy
01 ESG Strategy & Commitment
Does the organisation have a clear, resourced sustainability strategy with leadership accountability?
0/4 answered
02 Environmental Impact & Climate Action
How well does the organisation measure, manage, and reduce its environmental footprint?
0/4 answered
03 Social Responsibility & Workforce
How does the organisation treat its people and contribute to the wellbeing of the communities it operates in?
0/4 answered
04 Governance & Transparency
Are governance structures, ethics, and accountability mechanisms strong enough to support credible ESG commitments?
0/4 answered
05 Measurement & Reporting
Does the organisation collect, verify, and use ESG data to drive decisions and accountability?
0/4 answered
06 Supply Chain & Stakeholder Engagement
Does the organisation extend its ESG expectations beyond its own walls and engage meaningfully with external stakeholders?
0/4 answered
ESG / Sustainability
Answer the questions above and your report builds here: an overall score, a score and target for each area, and the three changes that matter most.
About this model
About this assessment
About the ESG / Sustainability maturity model
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) maturity is not about producing a glossy sustainability report once a year. It is about how deeply an organisation embeds responsibility for its environmental footprint, its treatment of people, and the integrity of its governance into the decisions it makes every day. The organisations that get this right do not bolt ESG onto their strategy — they build strategy around it.
This model treats ESG as a continuum from awareness to integration. Many organisations begin with good intentions but struggle to move beyond reactive compliance or surface-level commitments. The assessment is designed to reveal where genuine progress has been made and where effort is still performative, fragmented, or under-resourced. It deliberately covers the full ESG spectrum — environment, social, and governance — because strength in one pillar does not compensate for neglect of another.
The goal is not perfection. It is honest self-assessment that helps organisations see where they stand today, prioritise the areas that matter most to their stakeholders, and build a credible path toward sustainability that is embedded in how the business actually operates.
24 questions across 6 key areas, assessing how well your organisation defines, resources, measures, and integrates ESG practices into strategy, operations, and stakeholder relationships. Takes approximately 10-15 minutes to complete.
Scoring is based on 3 maturity levels per question. Your overall score reflects the average maturity across all areas, highlighting where ESG commitment is strong and where it remains aspirational rather than operational.
Who this assessment is for
- Board members and non-executive directors with ESG oversight responsibilities
- Chief sustainability officers and ESG programme leads
- CFOs and investor relations teams navigating ESG disclosure requirements
- Operations and procurement leaders managing supply chain sustainability
- Strategy and risk leaders integrating ESG into business planning
- Anyone responsible for preparing sustainability reports or responding to ESG ratings
The three maturity levels
- Level 1 -- Awareness: ESG is on the radar but not yet embedded. The organisation recognises the importance of sustainability but efforts are fragmented, under-resourced, or driven primarily by external pressure such as regulation, customer demands, or public scrutiny. There is no cohesive strategy, accountability is unclear, and data collection is manual and inconsistent. Environmental and social commitments are aspirational rather than measurable.
- Level 2 -- Committed: ESG goals are formalised, funded, and tracked. The organisation has made public commitments, assigned accountability to named leaders, and begun building the structures needed to deliver. Reporting follows recognised frameworks, key metrics are monitored, and sustainability considerations are included in major business decisions. Supply chain due diligence has started, and stakeholder engagement is becoming more deliberate. The foundation is solid, but ESG is still managed as a distinct workstream rather than a way of operating.
- Level 3 -- Integrated: ESG is inseparable from how the business runs. Sustainability shapes investment decisions, product design, supplier relationships, and governance structures. Data is managed with the same rigour as financial data, targets are science-based and independently assured, and the organisation is transparent about both progress and setbacks. Leadership is accountable, employees are engaged, and the organisation actively contributes to systemic change in its industry and communities.
The 6 areas assessed
- ESG Strategy & Commitment -- Does the organisation have a clear, resourced sustainability strategy with leadership accountability?
- Environmental Impact & Climate Action -- How well does the organisation measure, manage, and reduce its environmental footprint?
- Social Responsibility & Workforce -- How does the organisation treat its people and contribute to the wellbeing of the communities it operates in?
- Governance & Transparency -- Are governance structures, ethics, and accountability mechanisms strong enough to support credible ESG commitments?
- Measurement & Reporting -- Does the organisation collect, verify, and use ESG data to drive decisions and accountability?
- Supply Chain & Stakeholder Engagement -- Does the organisation extend its ESG expectations beyond its own walls and engage meaningfully with external stakeholders?
How this model relates to other frameworks
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI Standards)
- IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards (ISSB S1/S2)
- Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations, now incorporated into the ISSB standards
- SASB Standards (now maintained by the ISSB)
- UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
- Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)
- CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)
- EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) / European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS)
- UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)
- ISO 14001 Environmental Management Systems
Frequently asked questions
What is the ESG / Sustainability maturity model?
Assess how deeply your organisation embeds environmental, social, and governance practices into strategy, operations, and reporting. It is an original, simplified model with three maturity levels (Awareness, Committed and Integrated), assessed through 24 questions across 6 areas: ESG Strategy & Commitment, Environmental Impact & Climate Action, Social Responsibility & Workforce, Governance & Transparency, Measurement & Reporting and Supply Chain & Stakeholder Engagement.
How long does the ESG / Sustainability assessment take?
Most people finish in 10–14 minutes. Each of the 24 questions has three concrete answer options. Your progress is saved in the page URL, so you can bookmark it and come back later.
How is the score calculated?
Each answer scores 1 (Awareness), 2 (Committed) or 3 (Integrated). An area's score is the average of its answered questions, and the overall score is the average of the area scores, so every area counts equally. Scores run from 1.0 to 3.0.
Is my data stored or shared?
No. Your answers are never sent to a server. They are stored only in the page URL, which you control. Copy the link to share results with colleagues, or export a PDF or CSV report.
How should I use the results?
Start with "Where to focus" in your report. It lists the questions with the biggest gap to the target you set for each area, and shows what the next level looks like in practice. For a fuller picture, ask several people from different teams to complete the assessment and compare their links. Differences in perception are often as revealing as the scores themselves.