0 / 24

Model 11 of 74 · Strategy & Governance

Strategic Planning & Alignment Maturity Assessment

Assess how well your organisation develops strategy, communicates direction, aligns execution, and adapts to changing conditions.

Pillars & areas

Define

Set the direction

  1. 01Strategy Development & Vision
  2. 05Environmental Scanning & Adaptation

Align

Turn it into action

  1. 02Strategic Communication & Cascade
  2. 03Alignment & Execution

Measure

Track what matters

  1. 04Performance Measurement & Review
  2. 06Resource Allocation & Prioritisation

Levels

  1. 1Short-TermShort-term pressures
  2. 2DeliberateDocumented & owned
  3. 3AdaptiveLiving discipline

01 Strategy Development & Vision

Does the organisation have a clear, well-constructed strategy that articulates where it is headed and why?

0/4 answered

SDV-1How does your organisation define its long-term direction?

Think about whether there is a documented statement of where the organisation wants to be in 3-5 years, or whether direction shifts with each new leader or crisis.

SDV-2How are strategic priorities identified and selected?

Consider whether priorities emerge from rigorous analysis or from whoever presents most persuasively at a leadership meeting.

SDV-3How well does your strategy address risks and uncertainties?

Think about whether the strategic plan acknowledges what could go wrong and includes contingencies, or whether it assumes a best-case path.

SDV-4How involved are diverse perspectives in shaping the strategy?

Consider whether strategy is created exclusively by the executive team or whether frontline, customer, and cross-functional perspectives are actively sought.

02 Strategic Communication & Cascade

Is the strategy communicated so that every person understands the direction and their role in it?

0/4 answered

SCC-1How is the strategy communicated to the wider organisation?

Think about whether people across the organisation could describe the strategic direction in their own words, or whether the strategy lives in a document nobody reads.

SCC-2How effectively do team-level objectives connect to the organisational strategy?

Consider whether team goals are clearly derived from strategic priorities or whether teams set goals in isolation.

SCC-3How well does the organisation communicate strategic trade-offs and what it has chosen not to do?

Strategy is as much about what you say no to as what you say yes to — think about whether people understand what has been deprioritised and why.

SCC-4How consistently do leaders at all levels reinforce the strategic message?

Think about whether middle managers and team leads echo the same strategic narrative, or whether the message changes or disappears as it moves down the hierarchy.

03 Alignment & Execution

Are resources, structures, and day-to-day activities genuinely aligned to strategic priorities?

0/4 answered

AE-1How well are major initiatives and projects linked to strategic priorities?

Consider whether every active project can be traced to a strategic goal, or whether the project portfolio has grown organically with no strategic filter.

AE-2How does the organisation handle work that does not align with strategic priorities?

Think about whether there is a mechanism to stop or scale back work that no longer serves the strategy, or whether everything continues indefinitely once started.

AE-3How well do organisational structures support the execution of strategic priorities?

Consider whether the way teams and departments are organised helps or hinders the delivery of strategic goals.

AE-4How effectively do cross-functional teams collaborate on strategic initiatives?

Think about whether departments work together smoothly on shared strategic goals or whether turf wars and handoff failures are common.

04 Performance Measurement & Review

Does the organisation track strategic progress with meaningful metrics and act on what they reveal?

0/4 answered

PMR-1How does the organisation measure progress against its strategic goals?

Consider whether there are specific, measurable indicators tied to each strategic goal, or whether progress is assessed by gut feel in leadership meetings.

PMR-2How often does the leadership team formally review strategic progress?

Think about whether strategic reviews happen on a disciplined schedule or only when a crisis forces the conversation.

PMR-3What happens when strategic metrics show that a goal is off track?

Consider whether poor performance triggers genuine corrective action or whether it is explained away and carried forward.

PMR-4How transparent is strategic performance data across the organisation?

Think about whether only the executive team sees how the strategy is tracking, or whether this information is shared more broadly.

05 Environmental Scanning & Adaptation

Does the organisation systematically monitor its external environment and adapt its strategy accordingly?

0/4 answered

ESA-1How does your organisation monitor changes in its external environment?

Think about whether there is a structured process for tracking market trends, regulatory shifts, competitor moves, and technological developments, or whether these are only noticed when they cause problems.

ESA-2How quickly can your organisation adjust its strategic direction when conditions change significantly?

Consider the last time a major external event required a strategic response — how long did it take to decide and act?

ESA-3How does the organisation use customer and market insights to inform strategy?

Think about whether customer feedback, market research, and competitive intelligence are systematically fed into strategic planning or treated as separate activities.

ESA-4How well does the organisation anticipate disruption rather than just respond to it?

Consider whether leadership actively looks for emerging threats and opportunities, or whether the organisation only reacts after disruption has already occurred.

06 Resource Allocation & Prioritisation

Are budgets, people, and attention allocated in ways that genuinely reflect strategic priorities?

0/4 answered

RAP-1How closely does budget allocation reflect strategic priorities?

Think about whether funding decisions are driven by strategic goals or by historical budgets, political influence, and inertia.

RAP-2How does the organisation allocate its best people to its most important strategic work?

Consider whether your strongest talent is deployed on strategic priorities or trapped in operational roles because nobody can replace them.

RAP-3How does the organisation decide between competing demands for the same resources?

Think about whether there is a clear and fair process for resolving resource conflicts, or whether the most senior or most persistent leader always wins.

RAP-4How effectively does the organisation reallocate resources when strategic priorities shift?

Consider whether resources stay locked in original commitments even when priorities change, or whether the organisation can genuinely move money and people to where they are needed most.

Self-assessment report

Strategic Planning & Alignment

Answer the questions above and your report builds here: an overall score, a score and target for each area, and the three changes that matter most.

About this model

About the Strategic Planning & Alignment maturity model

Strategy without alignment is just a document. Many organisations invest heavily in crafting strategic plans only to watch them gather dust while daily decisions are made on instinct, inertia, or whoever shouts loudest. The gap between strategy-as-written and strategy-as-lived is where most organisations lose their way — not because the strategy was wrong, but because it was never truly embedded into how people think, prioritise, and act.

This model assesses the full lifecycle of strategic planning and alignment: from how direction is set and priorities chosen, through how strategy is communicated and cascaded, to whether resources, structures, and daily activities genuinely reflect what the organisation says matters most. It also examines the often-neglected disciplines of environmental sensing and strategic adaptation — because a strategy that cannot evolve is a strategy that will eventually fail.

The goal is not to reward complexity or formality for its own sake. An organisation with a simple, clearly communicated strategy that is genuinely lived will score higher than one with a 200-page strategic plan that nobody follows. What matters is whether strategy actually shapes decisions, not whether it exists on paper.

24 questions across 6 key areas, assessing your organisation's ability to develop, communicate, execute, measure, and adapt its strategic direction. Takes approximately 10-15 minutes to complete.

Scoring is based on 3 maturity levels per question. Your overall score reflects the average maturity across all areas, giving you a clear picture of where your strategic planning and alignment capability is strong and where it needs attention.

Who this assessment is for

  • CEOs, managing directors, and general managers responsible for setting direction
  • Strategy directors and heads of planning
  • Chief operating officers responsible for strategic execution
  • Division and business unit leaders translating strategy into action
  • Board members and non-executive directors overseeing strategic governance
  • Programme and portfolio managers aligning delivery to strategy
  • Management consultants advising on strategic planning

The three maturity levels

  • Level 1 — Short-Term: Strategy is absent, informal, or exists only on paper. Decisions are driven by short-term pressures, leadership instinct, or whoever advocates most forcefully. There is no consistent process for setting direction, and priorities shift with each new crisis. People across the organisation cannot articulate where the organisation is headed or why. Resources follow historical patterns rather than strategic intent, and the organisation is regularly caught off guard by external changes.
  • Level 2 — Deliberate: Strategy is documented, communicated, and follows a recognisable planning cycle. Priorities are explicitly chosen, key initiatives are linked to strategic goals, and progress is measured with defined metrics. Leaders take ownership of strategic delivery, and most people understand the broad direction. Resource allocation reflects strategic intent, though operational demands often compete. The organisation monitors its environment and adjusts course, albeit with some delay.
  • Level 3 — Adaptive: Strategy is a living discipline embedded into how the organisation operates. Direction is co-developed with diverse input, continuously tested against evidence, and adjusted rapidly when conditions change. Every person can connect their work to a strategic priority. Resources flow to the highest-value work with minimal friction. Environmental scanning is systematic, scenario planning is routine, and the organisation has a track record of anticipating change rather than merely reacting to it. Strategic planning is not an annual event — it is an ongoing conversation that shapes daily decisions.

The 6 areas assessed

  1. Strategy Development & Vision — Does the organisation have a clear, well-constructed strategy that articulates where it is headed and why?
  2. Strategic Communication & Cascade — Is the strategy communicated so that every person understands the direction and their role in it?
  3. Alignment & Execution — Are resources, structures, and day-to-day activities genuinely aligned to strategic priorities?
  4. Performance Measurement & Review — Does the organisation track strategic progress with meaningful metrics and act on what they reveal?
  5. Environmental Scanning & Adaptation — Does the organisation systematically monitor its external environment and adapt its strategy accordingly?
  6. Resource Allocation & Prioritisation — Are budgets, people, and attention allocated in ways that genuinely reflect strategic priorities?

How this model relates to other frameworks

  • Balanced Scorecard (Kaplan & Norton) — strategy mapping and performance measurement across four perspectives
  • Hoshin Kanri (Policy Deployment) — structured cascade of strategic objectives from top to frontline
  • OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) — goal-setting framework linking organisational and team-level objectives
  • PESTLE Analysis — structured environmental scanning across political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors
  • Porter's Five Forces — competitive environment analysis informing strategic positioning
  • McKinsey Three Horizons — framework for balancing current performance with future growth
  • EFQM Model — European quality framework covering strategy, leadership, and results alignment
  • ISO 56001 / ISO 56002 Innovation Management — strategic approach to managing innovation portfolios

Frequently asked questions

What is the Strategic Planning & Alignment maturity model?

Assess how well your organisation develops strategy, communicates direction, aligns execution, and adapts to changing conditions. It is an original, simplified model with three maturity levels (Short-Term, Deliberate and Adaptive), assessed through 24 questions across 6 areas: Strategy Development & Vision, Strategic Communication & Cascade, Alignment & Execution, Performance Measurement & Review, Environmental Scanning & Adaptation and Resource Allocation & Prioritisation.

How long does the Strategic Planning & Alignment assessment take?

Most people finish in 10–14 minutes. Each of the 24 questions has three concrete answer options. Your progress is saved in the page URL, so you can bookmark it and come back later.

How is the score calculated?

Each answer scores 1 (Short-Term), 2 (Deliberate) or 3 (Adaptive). An area's score is the average of its answered questions, and the overall score is the average of the area scores, so every area counts equally. Scores run from 1.0 to 3.0.

Is my data stored or shared?

No. Your answers are never sent to a server. They are stored only in the page URL, which you control. Copy the link to share results with colleagues, or export a PDF or CSV report.

How should I use the results?

Start with "Where to focus" in your report. It lists the questions with the biggest gap to the target you set for each area, and shows what the next level looks like in practice. For a fuller picture, ask several people from different teams to complete the assessment and compare their links. Differences in perception are often as revealing as the scores themselves.