Model 04 of 74 · Leadership & People
Remote / Hybrid Work Maturity Assessment
Assess how well your organisation designs, supports, and sustains remote and hybrid work.
Pillars & areas
Levels
- 1ImprovisedOffice habits persist
- 2DesignedDeliberate & consistent
- 3ThrivingA genuine capability
01 Strategy & Policy
Has the organisation made clear, intentional decisions about how distributed work operates?
0/4 answered
02 Technology & Tools
Do people have the right tools, infrastructure, and support to work effectively from anywhere?
0/4 answered
03 Communication & Collaboration
Is communication designed for a distributed workforce, or are remote workers bolted onto office-era habits?
0/4 answered
04 Management & Trust
Are managers equipped to lead distributed teams with trust rather than surveillance?
0/4 answered
05 Culture & Connection
Does the organisation actively build belonging and connection across locations?
0/4 answered
06 Equity & Inclusion
Are remote and in-office workers treated equitably in terms of visibility, opportunity, and career progression?
0/4 answered
Remote / Hybrid Work
Answer the questions above and your report builds here: an overall score, a score and target for each area, and the three changes that matter most.
About this model
About this assessment
About the Remote / Hybrid Work maturity model
Remote and hybrid work is no longer an experiment — it's how a large proportion of the global workforce operates. But many organisations are still figuring out how to do it well. The difference between remote work that drains people and remote work that empowers them comes down to deliberate design — of communication, culture, tools, and trust.
This model assesses whether your organisation has moved beyond simply allowing remote work to actually designing for it. It covers the infrastructure, culture, management practices, and employee experience that determine whether distributed work is productive, equitable, and sustainable.
The goal is not to advocate for any particular model (fully remote, hybrid, or office-first) — it's to assess how mature your approach is, whatever model you've chosen.
24 questions across 6 key areas, assessing how well your organisation designs, supports, and sustains remote and hybrid work. Takes approximately 10-15 minutes to complete.
Who this assessment is for
- Senior leaders setting workplace strategy
- HR and people teams designing policies
- IT leaders responsible for collaboration tools and security
- Managers leading distributed or hybrid teams
- Facilities and workplace experience teams
The three maturity levels
- Level 1 — Improvised: Remote or hybrid work is permitted but not designed. People work from home with office-era tools and habits. Communication is chaotic, meetings dominate, and the experience depends entirely on your manager. There is no consistent approach, and remote workers often feel like second-class citizens compared to those in the office.
- Level 2 — Designed: The organisation has made deliberate choices about how remote and hybrid work operates. Policies are clear, tools are fit for purpose, and managers have guidance on leading distributed teams. The experience is reasonably consistent, though old office habits still surface and some equity gaps persist between remote and in-office staff.
- Level 3 — Thriving: Remote and hybrid work is a genuine capability, not just a policy. The organisation has redesigned communication, collaboration, culture, and career development for a distributed world. People are productive, connected, and equitably supported regardless of where they work. The model is regularly reviewed and improved based on data and feedback.
The 6 areas assessed
- Strategy & Policy — Has the organisation made clear, intentional decisions about how distributed work operates?
- Technology & Tools — Do people have the right tools, infrastructure, and support to work effectively from anywhere?
- Communication & Collaboration — Is communication designed for a distributed workforce, or are remote workers bolted onto office-era habits?
- Management & Trust — Are managers equipped to lead distributed teams with trust rather than surveillance?
- Culture & Connection — Does the organisation actively build belonging and connection across locations?
- Equity & Inclusion — Are remote and in-office workers treated equitably in terms of visibility, opportunity, and career progression?
How this model relates to other frameworks
- GitLab Remote Work Playbook
- Dropbox Virtual First framework
- Gallup research on hybrid work engagement
- Microsoft Work Trend Index
- CIPD Flexible and Hybrid Working guidance
Frequently asked questions
What is the Remote / Hybrid Work maturity model?
Assess how well your organisation designs, supports, and sustains remote and hybrid work. It is an original, simplified model with three maturity levels (Improvised, Designed and Thriving), assessed through 24 questions across 6 areas: Strategy & Policy, Technology & Tools, Communication & Collaboration, Management & Trust, Culture & Connection and Equity & Inclusion.
How long does the Remote / Hybrid Work assessment take?
Most people finish in 10–14 minutes. Each of the 24 questions has three concrete answer options. Your progress is saved in the page URL, so you can bookmark it and come back later.
How is the score calculated?
Each answer scores 1 (Improvised), 2 (Designed) or 3 (Thriving). An area's score is the average of its answered questions, and the overall score is the average of the area scores, so every area counts equally. Scores run from 1.0 to 3.0.
Is my data stored or shared?
No. Your answers are never sent to a server. They are stored only in the page URL, which you control. Copy the link to share results with colleagues, or export a PDF or CSV report.
How should I use the results?
Start with "Where to focus" in your report. It lists the questions with the biggest gap to the target you set for each area, and shows what the next level looks like in practice. For a fuller picture, ask several people from different teams to complete the assessment and compare their links. Differences in perception are often as revealing as the scores themselves.